Website founded by
Milan Velimirović
in 2006

4:12 UTC
ISC 2021



Remember me

Forgot your
Click here!
to create your account if you don't already have one.

Rating lists


MatPlus.Net Forum General Threats and duals (spawnoff thread)
You can only view this page!
(1) Posted by Hauke Reddmann [Thursday, May 10, 2012 14:22]

Threats and duals (spawnoff thread)

Take a problem with secondary threat correction (or what
the name is, I'm not sure it is what I think it is :-)
or even better a secondary Fleck (here I know definitely :-)

1.A (2.B) c~ 2.D,E,F

Would you see a move c' that just parries D as a worse dual
than the same thing in a free primary Fleck?
My, are you illogical then :-)

1.A (2.B) c~ 2.D

Would you see a move c' that is so idiotic that it introduces
a new mate E in addition to D as a dual? A move x that doesn't
parry B and introduces a new mate F isn't seen as a dual
after all (at least nowadays). My, are you even more illogical :P))

(Read Only)pid=8522
(2) Posted by Kevin Begley [Thursday, May 17, 2012 03:58]; edited by Kevin Begley [12-05-17]

You bring up a very interesting point.
Threat notation doesn't hold for Fleck Themed problems.
And, therefore, the definition of duals has to be altered.

So, what new notation is required, and what constitutes a dual within this new framework?

Furthermore, shouldn't the proper notation be stipulated, in the problem?
(Read Only)pid=8571
(3) Posted by Ian Shanahan [Thursday, May 17, 2012 09:48]


On the subject of Fleck theme, is it OK (or even desirable!) in an otherwise perfectly accurate ideal/total primary or secondary Fleck example to have a single move that actualizes all the threats - i.e. 1....c 2.A,B,C,... #? I think this actually improves thematic clarity, particularly for secondary Flecks. Moreover, in offshoot themes like Combinative Separation, such a 'null move' is demanded!
(Read Only)pid=8572
(4) Posted by Hauke Reddmann [Thursday, May 17, 2012 13:55]

@Kevin - and since there is no such thing as a pass move in chess,
does it follow that there are no such things as threats? :-)


(Note: Today is "Fathers Day" in Germany, meaning that countless
rednecks run around bombed, blitzed, stuffed to the gills etc.
[use Garbage "The boys wanna fight" for more synonyms if needed]
I'm a teetotaler and want to point out this posting was made
with 0.00 promille - in case anyone thought otherwise :-)
(Read Only)pid=8575
(5) Posted by Kevin Begley [Thursday, May 17, 2012 16:52]


It really does not logically follow, from a lack of free-move, that threats are not part of problems (or the game).
Imagining the free move is only a method, which is used to determine the threat.

If you're serious about this, could you please provide an alternative notation (which does not use threats)?
(Read Only)pid=8576
(6) Posted by Hauke Reddmann [Friday, May 18, 2012 11:27]

Naaaah, total unserious :-)
But still, threats are a fictional device to simplify our thoughts,
and as it is with devices, it just takes one inventive
trickster to make them run amuck:

H. Reddmann, Schach-Report #4480
(= 10+8 )

#2 a) Dia b) Sd4->e6

Just ponder whether Black "prefers" to be mated with his knight on d4 or e6.
Of course, it makes no difference for him - only threat and mate after correction
are swapped in a) and b), to the effect they get almost equivalent.

(Read Only)pid=8579

No more posts

MatPlus.Net Forum General Threats and duals (spawnoff thread)