Website founded by
Milan Velimirović
in 2006
18:09 UTC
| |
MatPlus.Net  Forum Twomovers 2nd Grade Duals? H. Reddmann, Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung 12.8.2000, #2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
You can only view this page!
| | | (1) Posted by Hauke Reddmann [Wednesday, Nov 22, 2006 13:17] | 2nd Grade Duals? H. Reddmann, Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung 12.8.2000, #2
 (= 8+10 )
(For more analysis, see my website)
1.Qd6! Sf6?!? 2.S~#
Take any twomover with a threat(s). By common wisdom, anything that does
not parry* the threat(s) doesn't need to be considered, and especially
any such black move that produces multiple mates is not considered dualistic.
* Or at least differentiates, as in the Fleck case.
So far, so good. :-)
Take any twomover with threat(s) AND a random move parry against that threat(s)
which allows other mate(s) which need secundary corrections. In the above problem,
1...S~ 2.Sf5,Sc2#. By Reddmann only wisdom :-), anything that does
not parry* the threat(s) doesn't need to be considered, and especially
any such black move that produces multiple mates...hey, why was 1...Sf6?!?
a reason for a SCHWALBE rejection? Protest! Protest! :-)
* Or at least differentiates, 1...Sb6/Sb4 Java.
Any opinion on the matter is welcome, as long as it is identical to mine :-)
Hauke
| |
No more posts |
MatPlus.Net Forum Twomovers 2nd Grade Duals? H. Reddmann, Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung 12.8.2000, #2 |
|
|
|
ISC 2024