|Page: [Previous] [Next] 1 2 |
|(1) Posted by Dejan Glisić [Sunday, Jan 24, 2016 14:12]|
12 ISC 2016 - photos etc
12 ISC 2016 - tournament in Zagreb, Croatia
Link >>> http://www.pzrdig2.bloger.index.hr/post/12-medjunarodno-rjesavacko-natjecanje-isc--turnir-u-zagrebu/27861586.aspx
|(2) Posted by Eugene Rosner [Sunday, Jan 24, 2016 15:38]|
What's for lunch?!
|(3) Posted by Miodrag Mladenović [Monday, Jan 25, 2016 08:51]|
Congrats for Oto Mihalco! So far (out of 101 solvers) he is the only one to solve S#7. I spent at least 30 minutes looking into this problem but without any idea how to solve it.
|(4) Posted by Dejan Glisić [Monday, Jan 25, 2016 12:35]|
Eugene@ canapes with two sorts of sausages and cheese, margarine, pickled cucumbers and roasted peppers, cookies. Also few sorts of juices, coffee, tea and red wine, just as usual ;-)
|(5) Posted by Miodrag Mladenović [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 11:17]|
It's nice to see photos from this competition but I think that problemists are more interested in results. I can see result for one Croatian solver only but from the photos I can see more solvers?
@Other local controlers
Generally, I am wondering why there are no results from Russia, Ukraine, Croatia etc. I know that deadline for entering results is on Thursday but I am sure that solvers are eager to see results as soon as possible. As I can see there are no more than 10-20 solvers per location so it should not take too much time to enter results (of course preliminary results).
|(6) Posted by Evgeny Victorov [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 12:55]|
@Miodrag preliminary results in Russia:
... (6 solvers)
I don't know why local controllers haven't entered this results yet
|(7) Posted by Miodrag Mladenović [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 13:19]|
Thanks for an update.
|(8) Posted by Marjan Kovačević [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 14:02]|
There was another hard nut in Category A, endgame No.4.
According to the reports entered during the first two days, 16-years old Zivojin Perovic (Serbia) has been the only solver who got it completely, having the best combined score on two endgames (8 points)!
The missing provisional reports in Mat Plus ISC 2016 section remain a mystery ...
|(9) Posted by Evgeny Victorov [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 14:20]|
@Marjan A great result for a young solver! In my view if the first study was in tradiotional form (3 studies for 100 minutes) there were much more chances to solve it. But hard threemover, hard variants in 4mover and even problems with selfmate don't give enough time to solve a study (of cource, only in my view)
|(10) Posted by Miodrag Mladenović [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 15:46]; edited by Miodrag Mladenović [16-01-26]|
The solution of #12 (S#7) in Category 1 has incorrect 5th move. Instead of 5.Bxb3 it's written 5. Sxb3 (wrong). ( http://matplus.net/isc.php?px=1453819462&f=s&g=0 )
|(11) Posted by Aleksandr Bulavka [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 18:19]|
Solution of the №2 Category 3 wrong too. Written 1.Sce5, but must 1.Sec5
|(12) Posted by Vlaicu Crisan [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 18:43]|
Category 1, no 9: 1... Kc1 2.Bxd3#
The solution should list only 1...Kc2! as a valid defense.
|(13) Posted by Dejan Glisić [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 21:11]|
@Misha - I have publish results at blogg ... (www.pzrdig2.bloger.hr)
I had troubles while I was trying to publish results in ISC application by smartphone. Now it is OK and I am going to publish results soon, by computer...
|(14) Posted by Miodrag Mladenović [Tuesday, Jan 26, 2016 21:37]|
Thanks for an update. This explains why I see only one Croatian solver in the main ISC 2016 table. When I checked your site on Sunday there were no results. Now I can see them.
|(15) Posted by Miodrag Mladenović [Wednesday, Jan 27, 2016 09:02]|
It looks like Nick Bocharov from Ukraine has been entered twice. This will impact rating calculation.
|(16) Posted by Aleksandr Bulavka [Wednesday, Jan 27, 2016 09:07]|
Vladimir Aridov from Ukraine has been entered twice too
|(17) Posted by Andrey Selivanov [Wednesday, Jan 27, 2016 09:18]|
position #3 its correct?
|(18) Posted by Miodrag Mladenović [Wednesday, Jan 27, 2016 09:23]|
Category 1. - both #3 positions are OK. The first one (problem #3) was not easy to solve. I missed one variation. I saw it but I forgot to write it.
|(19) Posted by Evgeny Victorov [Wednesday, Jan 27, 2016 10:17]|
I think, Andrey meant that there is incorrect position №3 (first 4mover) in problems and solutions
|(20) Posted by Miodrag Mladenović [Wednesday, Jan 27, 2016 10:28]; edited by Miodrag Mladenović [16-01-27]|
You are right. I misunderstood Andrey's post. Yes the #3 moremover is not the one we were solving on Sunday. It was very unusual checkmate in four moves with a lots of variations and unanswered black check in initial position.
|Page: [Previous] [Next] 1 2 |
MatPlus.Net Forum Competitions 12 ISC 2016 - photos etc