MatPlus.Net

 Website founded by
Milan Velimirović
in 2006

0:09 UTC
ISC 2024
 
  Forum*
 
 
 
 

Username:

Password:

Remember me

 
Forgot your
password?
Click here!
SIGN IN
to create your account if you don't already have one.
CHESS
SOLVING

Tournaments
Rating lists
1-Oct-2024

B P C F





 
 
MatPlus.Net Forum General Unique proof games that are not SPGs
 
You can only view this page!
(1) Posted by Bob Baker [Sunday, Jun 4, 2023 23:16]

Unique proof games that are not SPGs


Recently in a forum at chess.com, the question came up of what is the greatest possible move-length difference between a position's shortest unique proof game and its SPG. Below is a position with a non-unique SPG of 17.5 moves and a unique proof game of 18.0 moves. Here the length difference between the SPG and the shortest unique proof game is only one ply.

Is this a question that has been asked, or that anyone should even want to ask?

r1Rqkbnr/p2ppppp/1p2B2Q/2p3B1/R2P4/5P1N/P1PNPP1P/2KR4
 
(Read Only)pid=24800
(2) Posted by James Malcom [Monday, Jun 5, 2023 00:23]

A classic can provide a starting answer: http://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/P0000811

(= 15+15 )

Non-Unique Solution: 3.0
Unique Solution: 4.0
Difference: 1.0
 
 
(Read Only)pid=24801
(3) Posted by Kevin Begley [Monday, Jun 5, 2023 04:00]

The example given does not show a completely identical position (which might be taken as a hint for anyone who hasn't yet solved that problem).
I'm not sure that matters, but it might be interesting to consider both possibilities.

Also, it might be interesting to consider a position which, rather than a SPG, has a unique PG in exactly M moves (and also a unique PG in N moves), such that the difference in moves are maximized (M-N).
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24802
(4) Posted by Joost de Heer [Monday, Jun 5, 2023 07:24]

 QUOTE 

Also, it might be interesting to consider a position which, rather than a SPG, has a unique PG in exactly M moves (and also a unique PG in N moves), such that the difference in moves are maximized (M-N).


Maximum difference that I know of is 4.5:
https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/P0008847
https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/P1013079

Note that in both situations, the solution for b) is not the shortest proofgame with white to move!

The maximum known difference between two solutions where both are the shortest proofgame with a given side to move is 3.5:
https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/P1000618
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24803
(5) Posted by Bob Baker [Monday, Jun 5, 2023 13:44]

In the position given by James, the shortest unique proof game has length 4.0, so the difference is 1.0. In Joost's positions, if I understand them, each twin is unique, so they don't qualify as cases where the shortest unique proof game is longer than the smallest SPG.
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24805
(6) Posted by James Malcom [Tuesday, Jun 6, 2023 00:26]

Bob, the position I gave can actually be an SPG in 4.5, per Per Olin's comment on PDB: 1. e3 e6 2. Bb5 Ke7 3. Bxd7 c6 4. Be8 Kxe8 5. e4
Thus, the difference is 1.5.
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24806
(7) Posted by Joost de Heer [Tuesday, Jun 6, 2023 08:24]

SPG is Shortest proof game, so both the 4.0 and the 4.5 moves are not SPG's.

Bob's question:
* Position A can be reached after X halfmoves with a non-unique proofgame
* Position A can also be reached after Y (>X) halfmoves in a unique proofgame (no other proofgame in Y halfmoves exists, no unique proofgames for X+1...Y-1 halfmoves).
Maximize Y-X.

The examples I gave are for a slightly different question:
* Position A has multiple unique proofgames in X1, X2 (, X3..., largest X is Xmax) halfmoves (i.e. there is exactly one proofgame in exactly X1/X2(/X3...) halfmoves). Maximize Xmax-X1.
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24807
(8) Posted by Bob Baker [Tuesday, Jun 6, 2023 10:54]

James, in my initial comment, I asked about maximizing the difference between the shortest proof game and the shortest unique proof game.
For the position you posted, what is the length of the shortest unique proof game?
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24809
(9) Posted by Joost de Heer [Tuesday, Jun 6, 2023 16:06]

 QUOTE 

Bob, the position I gave can actually be an SPG in 4.5, per Per Olin's comment on PDB: 1. e3 e6 2. Bb5 Ke7 3. Bxd7 c6 4. Be8 Kxe8 5. e4
Thus, the difference is 1.5.

See Bob's question:
 QUOTE 

what is the greatest possible move-length difference between a position's shortest unique proof game and its SPG

For the Orban position, the SPG has 3.0 moves and the shortest unique proof game has 4.0 moves. That there is also a unique proofgame in 4.5 moves is irrelevant to the question.
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24810
(10) Posted by James Malcom [Wednesday, Jun 7, 2023 10:56]

Ah, I see. Post edited.
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24811
(11) Posted by Bob Baker [Wednesday, Jun 7, 2023 12:51]

I could have shortened my initial question by asking for a position with the greatest difference between its SPG and its SUPG, except that I would then have had to answer the queries wanting to know what SUPG means, so it wouldn't have been shorter after all.
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24812
(12) Posted by Andrew Buchanan [Wednesday, Jun 7, 2023 16:11]

A few months ago, I added a keyword to PDB to capture a related idea. There are 25 currently: if you know more, please add.

https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/search.jsp?expression=k%3D%27unique+p%27+AND+NOT+G%3D%27Fairies%27+AND+K%3D%27twins+length+delta%27

The largest delta is 4.5, appearing twice.
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24813
(13) Posted by Joost de Heer [Wednesday, Jun 7, 2023 20:32]

@Andrew: The keyword is only added for positions where both the shortest and the non-shortest are unique. Bob specifically asks for positions where the SPG is NOT unique, but a longer game is.
 
   
(Read Only)pid=24814
(14) Posted by Andrew Buchanan [Thursday, Jun 8, 2023 03:42]

@Joost thanks for reading more carefully than I did :-). I will edit my text.
I guess one should filter in PDB on stip='genau' or stip='exact'
 
 
(Read Only)pid=24815

No more posts


MatPlus.Net Forum General Unique proof games that are not SPGs