|
| Page: [Previous] [Next] 1 2 |
| (21) Posted by Hauke Reddmann [Monday, May 6, 2024 08:11] |
@Marko: Aha! I was already suspicious that there might be more to this problem.
In any case, OTB handling of the rule has quite flipflopped:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty-move_rule#History
|
|
| (22) Posted by Joost de Heer [Monday, May 6, 2024 09:56] |
QUOTE
The purpose of this rule is to prevent a player with no chance of winning from obstinately continuing to play indefinitely or seeking to win by tiring the opponent.
And that's why I don't like the 50 move rule application in chess composition. In chess composition, there's no 'obstinately continuing' or 'tiring the opponent'.
|
|
| (23) Posted by Frank Richter [Monday, May 6, 2024 14:55] |
But you may 'tiring the solver' ...
|
|
| (24) Posted by Joost de Heer [Monday, May 6, 2024 15:18] |
I get tired from 2-movers, so that's for me too long. I shall all declare them unsolvable due to the 2-move rule.
|
|
No more posts |
Page: [Previous] [Next] 1 2
MatPlus.Net  Forum General 50 move rule in n# |
ISC 2024
